|
|

you are saying. With Socrates the truth is always revealed to be elusive, and in his discussion with young Phaedrus Socrates strongly suggests that the truth emerges not from those who seem wise and scientific, but from those who seem mad. There are different kinds of madness, and among them the madnesses inspired by gods, such as love, poetry and philosophy, are madnesses in which the world is seen in its reality. The truth, in this view, is that some kind of divinity inheres in the universe, and no statement can approach the truth unless it accounts for that underlying mystery. The absolute self, that 'you' which is possible to know, is far more complicated than any of us would like to imagine. In fact, it is probably nothing like what we believe, and beyond our capacity to understand by ourselves. The whole notion of "god" or "gods" is no idle or hasty metaphor for the sentiment, "Gee, that eclipse is strange." It is not a figure of speech which happened, tenor twenty thousand years ago, to stick. It is a way of saying that things happen in the universe which surpass human comprehension and, at some level, investigation. It is a way of saying that the nexus of our understanding achieves something both in and larger than ourselves; to try to see it would be like trying to view the whole ocean from a dinghy in the trough of two waves a thousand miles from shore. To have this view you would need to rise completely above your tiny dinghy, and the sight would be impossible to describe: tremendous triangular glistening blue waves, whitecapped, spray-ridden, extending infinitely in all directions, so extensive your eyes shut auto-matically, and you realize that the glare of the Sun on the sea-surface is so bright you have in any case been blinded, in a colossal prescience of dazzling azure. That would be a kind of madness to avoid. There would be no words to represent such an experience. You would be thrown back on yourself, tiny there in the midst of enormous breaking rollers. You would know intuitively that the whole of it was unimaginable to you, and therefore unreal in any objective sense. It occurred all in your mind, somewhere, deep in the unsurveyed deserts and boreal forests of your psyche, near its most violent earthquakes and volcanoes, under Algol. * * * There is an aspect of reality which, when glimpsed from just the right angle, is maddening. Often, as in a nightmare, it is nothing tangible or solidly visible, but simply a presence or a force lurking in the brush. Sometimes it is more direct, like the sudden awareness of exactly how enormous and how empty interstellar space is. Algol's distance of 100 light years seems in a relative sense inconsiderable, the entire galaxy being 100,000 light-years across, and the next sizable galaxy being 2.2 million light years away. But one light year alone is an incomprehensible span; in fact it isn't even useful to think of a light year as a distance, which is why we speak of it as a year. The distance to Algol, mostly blank except for patches of dust and gas, is truly fearful because it is so unreal. We come to grips with the dread of such an emptiness by reducing it to terms more our size. "100" is a manageable number; its spatial counterpart, 100 years x 180,000 miles per second (or 100 x 5,800,000,000,000 miles), is not. We create facts and categories which stand for these colossal notions, and they seem objective to us because we have reduced the horror of them. This is not away of knowing ourselves, really, but of evading ourselves. Socrates would accept this terminology as easily as he accepted the mythological terminology, and with no more nor less belief in it. The facts, in other words, are not the truth. They are an element of the truth. The second element is that part of the mind which joins the interstellar void and creates a monster out of it. The mind plays on the night sky, on constellations, on single stars, Algol. It is not the spectral class, visual magnitude, distance in light years, or mass relative to the Sun that works on the mind; those are merely facts which we use to comfort ourselves by assuring that stars are not gods but gases. It's the searing of its light on the inner mind which is |
memorable. The sky full of stars is beautiful, and one star, at least, is frightening. These experiences are all of a piece, at one point. I myself have frozen in terror under Algol. I spend as many clear nights as I can in the alfalfa field behind the barn near my house. It's a big field, for Maine. Thick maple, popple, pin cherry, and hophornbeam woods line its two ends, a quarter of a mile apart. An old cemetery rests beyond the trees on the north end, and paved camp roads skirt the sides, half a mile or so apart, with pine woods on the edges of those two roads. The farmer hays the field two or three times every summer. At dusk the field is tremendously beautiful. The wind stills. Swallows and swifts chip and dart, bobolinks sway precariously on weeds, and on clear evenings the sky goes deep slowly, violet all along the eastern line of trees, reddening and then silvering puffy clouds to a profound gray-blue in the west. By late September the field has that cool nut smell of fallen leaves, the air is sharp, the alfalfa's cut, and the grass is brown and stiff. One September night, as on many nights, I drove my truck before dark into the middle of the field and set up my small black reflecting telescope. I pulled out the legs of a card table and a half-shredded lawn chair, and piled on the table a cardboard sheaf of star maps which I can hardly read, a small flashlight, binoculars, a planisphere to see what time a star or galaxy will rise, and a hardbound book with smaller and less reliable maps. I sat at the card table for awhile, letting the sunlight fade and the darkness deepen. By September the mosquitoes have been frost bitten themselves, and that night the air was dry, and the night sky transpired to that panorama of crystal fires which burns in the psyche of every human being. The whole pattern of stars is probably genetically encoded and inscribed in us as the archetype of heaven. The more darkness there is, the more sounds there are. The rush of cars along the Bangor Road was magnified, even though the trees obscured their lights. Dogs barked occasionally in the nearby dairy farm, and their voices carried for what must have been miles. Owls hooted, and loons ululated desperately from the lake a half mile down the camp road. As always there was movement sometimes in the alders a football field away, or in the brush beside the barn. The darker it gets, the louder everything seems. With the binoculars I spotted M31, a brush-stroke of flight southeast of Cassiopeia. This is the nearby galaxy, 2.2 million light years away. It provides my mind, I fantasize night in and night out, a comfort in the deep black. This is a fortunate mark on the map. Sweeping easterly I ran straight into Perseus, and Algol, the Gorgon's eye, is the lead star. |
Algol |
Photo by Kevin Bennett |
I've stared at Algol through the binoculars and through the telescope, and it always starts as just another point of light. Turning the lenses on Mirfak or Capella nearby, or Altair, it isn't much different, not quite as bright as the others. But the longer you look at a star or a planet through a lens, the clearer it becomes. Your eye begins to notice things you didn't even guess at in the first ten minutes. Jupiter gets streaky, or a star takes on a distinct color and quality of brightness. For the time you're watching it, you can tell the star apart from any other, and if your visual memory is good, for long afterward. I aimed the yard-long tube of my telescope at Perseus and looked for a few minutes at the star clusters jewel-like against the blackness over Perseus's body. Then I shifted to Algol. Normally it's |